<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<th id="fpn9h"></th>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><strike id="fpn9h"></strike>
<th id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<span id="fpn9h"><video id="fpn9h"></video></span>
<ruby id="fpn9h"></ruby>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>

復雜銅鈷共伴生礦有價金屬回收綜述

Review on recovery of valuable metals from complex copper–cobalt co-associated mines

  • 摘要: 銅和鈷是重要的戰略有色金屬,因其優異的理化性質應用廣泛. 非洲剛果(金)等地區的復雜銅鈷共伴生礦,銅鈷比可達3∶1,是重要的銅鈷礦產資源. 由于全球對銅鈷需求的不斷增加,從復雜銅鈷共伴生礦(后續綜述表述為銅鈷礦)中協同提取銅、鈷等有價元素意義非凡. 本文綜述了包括氧化礦與硫化礦在內代表性復雜銅鈷共伴生礦資源的礦物學特點,全面比較和討論了氧化礦與硫化礦的焙燒、浸出等提取工藝的區別. 最后對從復雜共伴生銅鈷礦中提取銅、鈷的前景與挑戰進行了評估. 綜述表明氧化銅鈷礦更適合采用濕法工藝處理,而硫化銅鈷礦則更適合用焙燒–浸出相結合的強化浸出工藝處理. 綜述中對比了銅鈷礦金屬提取過程中的熱力學特點與動力學限制因素.

     

    Abstract: Copper and cobalt, both strategic metals, play an indispensable role in many fields, such as national infrastructure and defense science and technology. Copper, one of the earliest nonferrous metals discovered, extracted, and applied by humans, teams up with cobalt—a silver-white metal—that serves as a crucial raw material for superalloys, permanent magnets, and chemical industries. The production and consumption of these metals significantly affect the development of national infrastructure, essentially controlling the lifeblood of the national economy. The wide-ranging application of copper and cobalt necessitates an efficient extraction process for these resources. For instance, Congo, Africa, hosts complex copper–cobalt co-associated deposits where the copper–cobalt ratio can reach 3∶1, making it a significant resource. Given the increasing global demand for copper and cobalt, extracting these valuable elements from complex copper–cobalt co-associated ores is of paramount importance. This paper reviews the mineralogical characteristics of these complex resources, including oxidized ores and sulfide ores. It compares and discusses the characteristics of extraction processes such as roasting and leaching. Ultimately, it evaluates the prospects and challenges of extracting copper and cobalt from complex co-associated copper–cobalt deposits. The review reveals that copper–cobalt oxide ores are more compatible with pure wet process treatment, while sulfide ores are better suited for an enhanced leaching process combined with roasting and leaching. The thermodynamic characteristics and kinetic limiting factors of metal extraction from copper–cobalt ores are also compared in this review. In the extraction of the copper–cobalt oxide ore, the mature extraction process is reduction leaching, and different reducing agents show different leaching effects. It is worth noting that there are significant differences in the degree of weathering of copper oxide cobalt ores. Considering Africa’s relatively underdeveloped power facilities and the shortage of chemical reagents, biological leaching and heap leaching present alternative methods for copper oxide cobalt ores. For copper and cobalt sulfide ores, the promising approach for industrial application is a method that combines enrichment, roasting, and leaching. As the copper–cobalt sulfide ore is nearly the only cobalt occurrence mineral, strengthening the phase transformation of copper–cobalt sulfide ore is vital for cobalt extraction. This can be optimized from both thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives. The aim of this paper is to provide some references for the efficient and reasonable collaborative extraction and utilization of copper–cobalt resources.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<th id="fpn9h"></th>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><strike id="fpn9h"></strike>
<th id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<span id="fpn9h"><video id="fpn9h"></video></span>
<ruby id="fpn9h"></ruby>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
www.77susu.com