<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<th id="fpn9h"></th>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><strike id="fpn9h"></strike>
<th id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<span id="fpn9h"><video id="fpn9h"></video></span>
<ruby id="fpn9h"></ruby>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>

鋰離子電池隔膜物理及電化學性能評價及對比

Evaluation and comparison of the physical and electrochemical properties of lithium-ion battery separators

  • 摘要: 對目前被廣泛使用的聚乙烯隔膜、聚丙烯隔膜、聚丙烯/聚乙烯/聚丙烯三層復合隔膜和氧化鋁涂覆聚乙烯隔膜的物理性能和電化學性能進行了詳細的分析對比. 研究表明:氧化鋁涂覆聚乙烯隔膜相比于其他三種隔膜,除拉伸強度略低于聚丙烯/聚乙烯/聚丙烯三層復合隔膜外,在耐穿刺性、熱穩定性、潤濕性及離子電導率等方面均具有更突出的性能. 其穿刺強度達到了426.91 N?mm?1,并且在140 ℃下熱處理1 h基本沒有熱收縮. 氧化鋁顆粒的親水性提高了隔膜與電解液之間的潤濕性,使得隔膜具有優異的離子電導率(0.719 mS·cm?1),并且100次循環后容量保持率為91.19%,優于聚乙烯隔膜、聚丙烯隔膜、聚丙烯/聚乙烯/聚丙烯三層復合隔膜. 表明氧化鋁涂覆聚乙烯隔膜與其他三種隔膜相比在長循環、高功率和高安全性的鋰離子電池中具有最好的應用前景.

     

    Abstract: The separator is one of the core inner components of the lithium-ion battery, and its performance directly affects the electrochemical properties, life, and safety performance of the battery. In this research, the physical and electrochemical properties of polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) / PE/PP multilayer, (PP), and aluminum oxide ceramic-coated PE (PE–Al2O3) separators were analyzed and compared in detail. Among the separators, the PE–Al2O3 separator exhibited better performance pertaining to puncture strength, thermal stability, wettability, and ionic conductivity. However, its tensile strength is slightly lower than that of the PP/PE/PP separator. The surface of the PE, PP, and PP/PE/PP separators exhibited a large number of submicron pores. Alumina particles were uniformly distributed on the surface of the PE–Al2O3 separator, and a large number of clear pores were presented between the alumina particles. The PP/PE/PP separator exhibited the best tensile properties among the separators in the mechanical direction; the tensile strength of the PP/PE/PP separator was 247.53 MPa, which is higher than that of the PE–Al2O3 (197.58 MPa), PP (119.06 MPa), and PE (147.69 MPa) separators. Meanwhile, the puncture strength of the PE separator was the lowest among the separators at 144.26 N?mm?1 whereas that of the PE–Al2O3 separator was the highest at 426.91 N?mm?1, which was attributed to the high hardness of alumina particles. The melting temperature of the PE–Al2O3 separator was 140.9 ℃, which is lower than that of the PP and PP/PE/PP separators but higher than that of the PE separator. Further, it exhibited no heat shrinkage with heat treatment at 140 ℃ for 1 h. Accordingly, the PE–Al2O3 separator exhibited the best thermal stability compared to the PP, PP/PE/PP, and PE separators. The unique hydrophilic properties of alumina particles improved the wettability between the separator and electrolyte; the wetting angle between the PE–Al2O3 separator and the electrolyte was 12.3°, which was considerably smaller than that for the PP (35.9°), PE (38.3°), and PP/PE/PP (35.3°) separators. The electrolyte wettability of the PE–Al2O3 separator effectively reduced the transmission resistance of lithium ions between the anode and cathode, enabling the separator to exhibit an excellent ionic conductivity (0.719 mS·cm?1). After 100 cycles at 1 C, the capacity retention rate of the PE Al2O3 separator was 91.19%, which was considerably better than the other three types of separators. To summarize, this study reveals that the PE–Al2O3 separator has the best application prospect in high power, long-term stability, and high-safety lithium-ion batteries.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<th id="fpn9h"></th>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><strike id="fpn9h"></strike>
<th id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<span id="fpn9h"><video id="fpn9h"></video></span>
<ruby id="fpn9h"></ruby>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
www.77susu.com