<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<th id="fpn9h"></th>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><strike id="fpn9h"></strike>
<th id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<span id="fpn9h"><video id="fpn9h"></video></span>
<ruby id="fpn9h"></ruby>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>

碳纖維板加固H型鋼梁抗剝離夾具研制及應用試驗

Development and experiment of grippers to prevent debonding in H-shaped steel beams strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer plates

  • 摘要: 外貼碳纖維板是鋼梁抗彎加固的常用方法,但其端部易因界面應力集中導致剝離破壞,嚴重影響高性能材料的有效利用,特別是結構加固后的安全服役. 為此開發出一種適用于H型鋼梁的簡易夾具——C形槽板夾,以加強碳纖維板的端部錨固. 通過多根帶夾碳纖維板加固梁的靜力加載試驗,驗證了此夾具的可靠性,并考察了碳纖維板伸入剪跨段長度與剪跨段長度之比及錨固方式(純粘、端錨和混錨)對加固效果的影響. 研究發現端錨加固不同于純粘,只要梁的控制截面仍在夾具之間,碳纖維板的極限應力、加固效果及利用效率均隨其長度縮短而提高,當碳纖維板長度分別為600、750 mm時,前者極限應變和承載力比后者分別高27.3%和8.1%. 由于鋼梁表面處理質量較差,混錨加固梁均發生突然剝離,后期退化為端錨加固梁,因而相比端錨加固梁加固效果改善不大,需要提高表面處理質量再做類似研究. 盡管如此,相比純粘加固梁,混錨加固梁采用C形槽板夾后剝離破壞被延遲,抗彎性能大為改善. 試驗過程中還用壓電阻抗法對界面剝離情況進行了檢測,結果符合實際.

     

    Abstract: External bonding of carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) plates is a common method for the flexural strengthening of steel beams. However, the interfacial stress concentration at the CFRP plate end can easily cause premature debonding failure of strengthened beams. Consequently, the high performance of the materials is not fully utilized, and the safety of the strengthened beams may be threatened. To address this issue, the paper proposes a simple C-shaped plate gripper to strengthen H-shaped steel beams, which can improve the anchorage at the CFRP plate end. Four-point bending tests were conducted for strengthened beams to verify gripper reliability. The strengthening effect was examined by changing the ratio of the bond length (measured from load point to the CFRP plate end) to the shear span length and anchorage types. There are three types of anchorage: in the first type, the CFRP plate is bonded only on the tensile face of the beam; in the second type, the CFRP plate is attached to the tensile face of the beam and a gripper is attached to the end of the CFRP plate; in the third type, a combination of the above two types is utilized. These types are called pure bonding, end anchorage, and hybrid strengthening, respectively. The case with an anchorage at the CFRP plate end is considerably different from the case of pure bonding. The former relies on mechanical force transfer, while the latter relies on an epoxy resin for bonding. As long as failure does not occur first in the outer section of the CFRP plate, the strain and utilization ratio of the CFRP plate, along with the related strengthening effect, will increase as the length of the CFRP plate decreases. For a strengthened beam with a CFRP plate length of 600 mm, the ultimate strain and load are 27.3% and 8.1% higher than those of the case with a CFRP plate length of 750 mm, respectively. Notably, the hybrid strengthened beams debonded suddenly and degraded to beams with only end anchorage in the subsequent loading stage. There is no obvious improvement in beams with hybrid strengthening compared with those with only end anchorage. This can be attributed to the poor surface treatment of the beams. Thus, it is necessary to improve the quality of surface treatment in the future. Compared with the cases of pure bonding, the flexural behavior is greatly improved for the cases with end anchorage for hybrid strengthened beams because the grippers can successfully impede the debonding of the CFRP plate. Herein, the debonding process was detected in real time using the piezoresistance method, which exhibits consistent results with the test phenomena.

     

/

返回文章
返回
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<th id="fpn9h"></th>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><strike id="fpn9h"></strike>
<th id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h">
<span id="fpn9h"><video id="fpn9h"></video></span>
<ruby id="fpn9h"></ruby>
<strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span>
www.77susu.com