Directional fracture mechanism and surrounding rock damage characteristics of slotted cartridge blasting
-
摘要: 依據彈性波動理論，結合沖擊波在巖石或類巖石介質中的傳播規律，建立了切縫藥包爆破時切縫方向與非切縫方向的孔壁峰值應力、粉碎區和裂隙區范圍之間的比例關系。利用AUTODYN軟件建立了切縫藥包爆破模型，在其切縫方向與非切縫方向各等間距設置5個測點，對測點處的應力峰值、爆破振動速度峰值以及峰值對應的時間進行了分析。而后基于淮南礦區顧北煤礦的巷道爆破試驗，進行了普通藥包、切縫藥包以及不同周邊孔間距的爆破試驗，研究了切縫藥包以及周邊孔間距的大小對圍巖損傷度的影響。結果表明，使用切縫藥包爆破時，在其切縫方向會產生爆轟產物射流和應力集中，同時會減弱非切縫方向的應力峰值和爆破振動速度，延緩非切縫方向的能量傳播速度，減弱非切縫方向的能量傳播大小，從而達到定向斷裂的目的；通過現場試驗可以發現，使用切縫藥包比使用普通藥包爆破后，圍巖的損傷度下降了30%以上；當使用切縫藥包爆破時，隨著周邊孔間距的增大，爆后圍巖損傷度呈下降趨勢。Abstract: According to the elastic wave theory combined with the propagation law of shock waves in rock or rock-like media, a slotted pipe wall is assumed to be elastic, irrespective of the attenuation process of detonation and shock waves in the coupling medium. The reflection of detonation and shock waves at the slotted pipe and blasthole walls is also assumed to be positive reflections, and the flow rate and internal energy constantly change with time. The proportional relationship between the peak stress of the hole wall, the range of the crushing area, and the fracture area in the cutting and non-cutting directions was established in this study. Moreover, AUTODYN software was used to establish a slit charge blasting model. Five measuring points were set at equal intervals in slit and non-slit directions. The peak stress, peak blasting vibration velocity, and peak arrival time at the measuring points were analyzed. Thereafter, based on the tunnel blasting test of the Gubei Coal Mine in the Huainan mining area, blasting tests of ordinary charge packs, slit charge packs, and varying peripheral hole spacing were performed. The crack state of the surrounding rock before and after blasting was tested through drilling peeping. Then, a two-dimensional graph of the crack development of the surrounding rock before and after blasting was imported into the customized MATLAB box dimension calculation program for calculation. The results before and after blasting were obtained based on the linear fitting curve and the box-counting dimension of the pixel information matrix of the surrounding image of rock burst cracks after blasting. The influence of the size of the slit charge and the surrounding hole spacing on the damage degree of the surrounding rock was also investigated. The results indicate that when the slit charge is used for blasting, the detonation product jet and stress concentration are produced in the slit direction. Further, the stress peak value and blasting vibration speed in the non-slit direction decline, the energy propagation speed in the non-slit direction decreases, and the energy propagation size in the non-slit direction decreases to achieve the goal of directional fracture. The results of the field test indicate that the degree of damage of the surrounding rock is reduced by >30% after using slit charge blasting compared with ordinary charge blasting. When the slit charge is used for blasting, the degree of damage to the surrounding rock reduces with an increase in the distance between the surrounding holes.
-
圖 3 非切縫方向沖擊波在炮孔壁處的透反射示意圖
Figure 3. Transmission and reflection of the shock wave in non-slit direction at the blasthole wall
圖 7 切縫方向與非切縫方向測點處的應力峰值以及對應時間對比圖.（a）測點應力峰值；（b）測點應力峰值對應時間
Figure 7. Comparison of the peak stress and corresponding time at the measuring points in the cutting and non-cutting directions: (a) peak stress of the measuring point; (b) corresponding time of the peak stress for measuring point
圖 5 數值模擬測點布置圖（單位：mm）
Figure 5. Layout of measuring points for the numerical simulation (unit: mm)
圖 6 切縫藥包爆破應力隨時間變化圖.（a）6 μs；（b）7 μs；（c）8 μs；（d）9 μs；（e）10 μs；（f）12 μs
Figure 6. Chart of blasting stress versus time in the slotted cartridge: (a) 6 μs; (b) 7 μs; (c) 8 μs; (d) 9 μs ; (e) 10 μs; (f) 12 μs
圖 8 切縫藥包爆破震動速度隨時間變化圖.（a）2 μs；（b）3 μs；（c）5 μs；（d）6 μs；（e）8 μs；（f）12 μs
Figure 8. Chart of blasting vibration velocity versus time of the slotted cartridge: (a) 2 μs; (b) 3 μs; (c) 5 μs; (d) 6 μs ; (e) 8 μs; (f) 12 μs
圖 9 切縫方向與非切縫方向測點處的爆破速度峰值對比圖
Figure 9. Comparison of peak blasting velocity at the measuring points in the slit and non-slit directions
圖 10 周邊孔間距400 mm（未塞切縫管）爆破方案圖（單位：mm）
Figure 10. Blasting scheme of 400 mm (unplugged slotted pipe) surrounding the hole spacing (unit: mm)
圖 11 測孔布置圖.（a）正視圖；（b）俯視圖（單位：mm）
Figure 11. Pore layout: (a) face map; (b) prone view (unit:mm)
圖 12 各方案爆破前后圍巖爆生裂紋盒維數擬合結果.（a）周邊孔間距400 mm（未塞管，左幫）；（b）間距400 mm（未塞管，右幫）；（c）間距400 mm（塞管，左幫）；（d）間距400 mm（塞管，右幫）；（e）間距500 mm（塞管，左幫）；（f）間距500 mm（塞管，右幫）；（g）間距600 mm（塞管，左幫）；（h）間距600 mm（塞管，右幫）；（i）間距700 mm（塞管，左幫）；（j）間距700 mm（塞管，右幫）
Figure 12. Fitting results of the box dimension of rock burst cracks before and after blasting: (a) 400 mm perimeter hole spacing (unplugged, left side); (b) spacing 400 mm(unplugged, right side); (c) spacing 400 mm (plug, left side); (d) spacing 400 mm (plug, right side); (e) spacing 500 mm (plug, left side); (f) spacing 500 mm (plug, right side); (g) spacing 600 mm (plug, left side); (h) spacing 600 mm (plug, right side); (i) spacing 700 mm (plug, left side); (j) spacing 700 mm (plug, right side)
圖 13 不同方案圍巖受爆破作用的平均損傷度對比
Figure 13. Comparison of average damage degree of the surrounding rock subjected to blasting in different schemes
表 2 切縫管參數表
Table 2. Parameters of the slit tube
Material Density/
（g·cm?3）Tensile strength/MPa Impact strength/
（kJ·m–2）External diameter/
mmInternal diameter/
mmPVC 1.38 60.00 7.00 33.00 31.00 
下載: 導出CSV
表 3 巖石材料參數表
Table 3. Rock material parameters
Density/
（g·cm?3）G/kPa Compressive
strength/kPaTensile strength/
kPaShear strength/
kPaLongitudinal wave
velocity/（m·s–1）2.31 1.67×107 3.50×104 3.50×103 6.30×103 2920
下載: 導出CSV
表 1 炸藥參數表
Table 1. Explosive parameters
Explosivetype Density/
（g·cm–3）A/kPa B/kPa R1 R2 W C-J detonation pressure/kPa Detonation velocity/（m·s–1） TNT 0.88 3.14×108 2.78×106 4.20 0.80 0.26 7.60×106 3900
下載: 導出CSV
表 5 周邊孔間距400 mm（未塞切縫管）爆破作業表
Table 5. Explosion of 400 mm (unplugged slotted pipe) hole spacing
Blasthole Borehole
numberCharge quantity Blasthole
depth/mmAngle/（°） Ignition
orderConnection
modeNumber of holes Rolls of blast holes Subtotal/kg Horizontal Vertical Cutting hole 1–8 8 3 7.1 2000 78 90 Ⅰ Parallel connection Auxiliary hole Ⅰ 9–28 20 2 11.8 1800 90 90 Ⅱ Auxiliary hole Ⅱ 29–48 20 2 11.8 1800 90 90 Ⅲ Auxiliary hole Ⅲ 49–71 23 2 13.5 1800 90 90 Ⅳ Peripheral hole 72–99 28 2 16.5 1800 90 90 Ⅴ Bottom hole 100–115 16 2 9.4 1800 90 90 Ⅴ Total 112 70.1
下載: 導出CSV
表 6 爆破方案主要參數
Table 6. Parameters difference of blasting scheme
Usage of slit pipe Peripheral hole
spacing/mmCutting hole
depth/mDepth of other
holes/mExcess depth coefficient
of cutting hole/%Charge quantity of peripheral
holes
（Blast rolls/holes）Unplugged pipe 400 2.00 1.80 11.11 2 Plug pipe 400 1.90 1.70 11.76 2 500 2.00 1.80 11.11 2 600 2.00 1.80 11.11 2 700 1.90 1.70 11.76 2
下載: 導出CSV
www.77susu.com<span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span> <span id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"> <th id="fpn9h"></th> <strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><strike id="fpn9h"></strike> <th id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"> <span id="fpn9h"><video id="fpn9h"></video></span> <ruby id="fpn9h"></ruby> <strike id="fpn9h"><noframes id="fpn9h"><span id="fpn9h"></span> -
參考文獻
[1] Pu C J, Zhang Z C, Guo X B, et al. Current situation of cutting seam cartridge blasting and existent problems. Sichuan Metall, 2006, 28(4): 1 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5108.2006.04.001蒲傳金, 張志呈, 郭學彬, 等. 切縫藥包爆破的研究現狀和存在的問題. 四川冶金, 2006, 28(4):1 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5108.2006.04.001 [2] Yang Y Q, Zhang Q, Yu M S, et al. Technology of directional split blasting. J China Coal Soc, 1996, 21(3): 283 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.1996.03.013楊永琦, 張奇, 于慕松, 等. 定向控制斷裂爆破技術的研究. 煤炭學報, 1996, 21(3):283 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.1996.03.013 [3] Gao J S, Zhang J C. Analysis of the role of semicircle casing in directional seam blasting. Blasting, 1990, 7(4): 21高金石, 張繼春. 半圓套管在定向成縫爆破中的作用分析. 爆破, 1990, 7(4):21 [4] Tang Z H, Zhang Z C, Xiang K W, et al. The mechanism of lancing cartridge blasting. Yunnan Metall, 1998, 27(4): 7唐中華, 張志呈, 向開偉, 等. 切縫藥包爆破的作用機理. 云南冶金, 1998, 27(4):7 [5] Luo Y, Shen Z W. Study on the directional fracture controlled blasting with slit-charge in rock. J Vib Shock, 2006, 25(4): 155 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2006.04.042羅勇, 沈兆武. 切縫藥包巖石定向斷裂爆破的研究. 振動與沖擊, 2006, 25(4):155 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2006.04.042 [6] Yue Z W, Tian S Y, Chen Z Y. Influence of the interval between holes on crack propagation in slit charge blasting. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2018, 37(11): 2460 doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0625岳中文, 田世穎, 陳志遠. 炮孔間距對切縫藥包爆生裂紋擴展規律的影響. 巖石力學與工程學報, 2018, 37(11):2460 doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0625 [7] Yang R S, Jiang L L, Yang G L, et al. Numerical simulation of directional fracture blasting // Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modelling and Simulation. Manchester, 2009: 296 [8] Yang R S, Zuo J J, Yang G L. An experimental study on slotted cartridge directional controlled blasting. J Vib Shock, 2018, 37(24): 24 doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.24.005楊仁樹, 左進京, 楊國梁. 切縫藥包定向控制爆破的試驗研究. 振動與沖擊, 2018, 37(24):24 doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.24.005 [9] Wang Y B. The rock-breaking mechanism of directional fracture blast using an irregular shape cartridge and its field application. J Test Eval, 2019, 47(2): 20160496 doi: 10.1520/JTE20160496 [10] Yang R S, Wang Y B, Xue H J, et al. Dynamic behavior analysis of perforated crack propagation in two-hole blasting. Procedia Earth Planet Sci, 2012, 5: 254 doi: 10.1016/j.proeps.2012.01.044 [11] Yang R S, Zuo J J, Li Y L, et al. Experimental study of slotted cartridge explosion shock wave propagation characteristic with different cutting seam pipe material. J China Univ Min &Technol, 2019, 48(2): 229 doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.000977楊仁樹, 左進京, 李永亮, 等. 不同切縫管材質下切縫藥包爆炸沖擊波傳播特性研究. 中國礦業大學學報, 2019, 48(2):229 doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.000977 [12] Kang Y Q, Li Y, Xiao C L, et al. Fractal damage and crack propagation of PMMA in multiple slit charge blasting. Mater Today Commun, 2022, 31: 103249 doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103249 [13] Ding C X, Yang R S, Xiao C L, et al. Directional fracture behavior and stress evolution process of the multi-slit charge blasting. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2022, 152: 107037 doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107037 [14] Huang K. Experimental Study on Pre-splitting Blasting Optimum Slit Width of Split-Tube Charge Holder in Low Air Permeability Coal Seam [Dissertation]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science & Technology, 2020黃凱. 低透氣性煤層切縫藥包預裂爆破最優切縫寬度實驗研究[學位論文]. 淮南: 安徽理工大學, 2020 [15] Ding C X, Yang R S, Chen C, et al. Experimental study of the interaction of directional crack and open joint in slit charge blasting. Chin J Eng, 2021, 43(7): 894丁晨曦, 楊仁樹, 陳程, 等. 切縫藥包爆破定向裂紋與張開節理相互作用的實驗研究. 工程科學學報, 2021, 43(7):894 [16] Wang Y B. Study of the dynamic fracture effect using slotted cartridge decoupling charge blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2017, 96: 34 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.04.015 [17] Hu J H, Deng Y L, Wang C, et al. Numerical analysis of the slotted cartridge blasting crack extension by temporal-spatial evolution. Nonferrous Met Eng, 2019, 9(3): 82 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1744.2019.03.014胡建華, 鄧煜林, 王昌, 等. 切縫藥包光面爆破裂紋擴展時空演化分析. 有色金屬工程, 2019, 9(3):82 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1744.2019.03.014 [18] Wang W, Zhang J Q, Liu A. Study on eccentric uncoupled blasting effect of cutting seam pipe. Coatings, 2021, 11(1): 104 doi: 10.3390/coatings11010104 [19] Wei C H, Zhu W C, Bai Y, et al. Numerical simulation on cutting seam cartridge blasting under different in situ stress conditions. Explos Shock Waves, 2016, 36(2): 161 doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0161-09魏晨慧, 朱萬成, 白羽, 等. 不同地應力條件下切縫藥包爆破的數值模擬. 爆炸與沖擊, 2016, 36(2):161 doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0161-09 [20] Cheng B, Wang H B, Zong Q. Numerical simulation on blasting mechanism of slotted cartridge based on coupled SPH-FEM algorithm. Chin J Energ Mater, 2020, 28(4): 300 doi: 10.11943/CJEM2018363程兵, 汪海波, 宗琦. 基于SPH-FEM耦合法切縫藥包爆破機理數值模擬. 含能材料, 2020, 28(4):300 doi: 10.11943/CJEM2018363 [21] Shen T, Luo N, Qi F Z, et al. Numerical simulation and optimization of smooth blasting in rock roadway with split-tube charge holder. J Min Saf Eng, 2020, 37(4): 674 doi: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.04.004申濤, 羅寧, 戚福州, 等. 切縫藥包巖石巷道光面爆破數值模擬與優化研究. 采礦與安全工程學報, 2020, 37(4):674 doi: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.04.004 [22] Ning J G, Wang C, Ma T B. Explosion and Shock Dynamics. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2010寧建國, 王成, 馬天寶. 爆炸與沖擊動力學. 北京: 國防工業出版社, 2010 [23] Xu Y, Meng Y P, Zong Q, et al. Study on range of cranny and length of fissure expansion in fault zone. Rock Soil Mech, 2002, 23(1): 81 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.01.018徐穎, 孟益平, 宗琦, 等. 斷層帶爆炸裂隙區范圍及裂紋擴展長度的研究. 巖土力學, 2002, 23(1):81 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.01.018 [24] Zhu W H, Ming F, Song C Z. Fractal study of rock damage under blasting loading. Rock Soil Mech, 2011, 32(10): 3131 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.10.040祝文化, 明鋒, 宋成梓. 爆破荷載作用下巖體損傷破壞的分形研究. 巖土力學, 2011, 32(10):3131 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.10.040 [25] Yang R S, Xu P. Fractal study of media damage under blasting loading. J China Coal Soc, 2017, 42(12): 3065 doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0107楊仁樹, 許鵬. 爆炸作用下介質損傷破壞的分形研究. 煤炭學報, 2017, 42(12):3065 doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0107 -
點擊查看大圖
計量
- 文章訪問數: 552
- HTML全文瀏覽量: 140
- PDF下載量: 80
- 被引次數: 0
