Time-frequency characteristics of acoustic-electric signals induced by coal fracture under uniaxial compression based on full-waveform
-
摘要: 建立了煤巖受載破壞聲電全波形同步采集系統, 對煤樣單軸壓縮破壞過程中的聲電信號進行了全波形采集, 研究了聲電信號能量與載荷降之間的相關關系, 并分析了聲電信號的頻譜特征. 結果表明: (1)煤體受載破壞過程中產生顯著的聲電信號; 電磁輻射信號是陣發性的, 僅伴隨載荷降和較高強度聲發射信號出現; (2)相對于聲發射, 電磁輻射與載荷降有更好的相關性; 與煤體受載破壞的能量釋放累積量相關聯的聲電信號能量和載荷降累計值三者之間均呈高度正相關; (3)電磁輻射優勢頻帶窄于聲發射, 前者主要集中在1~25 kHz, 后者主要集中在1~280 kHz; 受同一裂紋萌生和擴展的影響, 兩者在頻譜和主頻分布上都有近似的低頻成分.Abstract: The geological conditions of coal mines in China are complicated. In recent years, with the continuous increase of intensity and depth of coal mining, coal and rock dynamic disasters are becoming more and more serious, and an important factor threatening the safety of coal mining. The accurate monitoring and early warning of coal and rock dynamic disasters are of great significance for disaster prevention. A large number of experiments conducted on both laboratory and field scales have demonstrated that the energy accumulated in rock material under loading can be released in the forms of acoustic emission (AE), electromagnetic radiation (EMR), etc. Therefore, AE and EMR, as the real-time, dynamic and continuous geophysical monitoring methods, have been widely used and played important roles in the field of monitoring and early-warning of coal and rock dynamic disasters in mines. To further study the time-frequency characteristics of AE and EMR and the relationships between these characteristics and load, and to provide the experimental basis for the monitoring and early warning of coal and rock dynamic disasters, an acoustic-electric full-waveform synchronous acquisition system of coal and rock fracture under loading was constructed in this paper. Using this system, the full-waveforms of AE and EMR of failure processes of coal samples under uniaxial compression were collected. The correlations among AE energy, EMR energy and load drop were studied, and the spectral characteristics of AE and EMR were analyzed. The results show that, (1) obvious acoustic-electric signals are emitted during the process of coal failure under loading. EMR is the paroxysmal signal, only accompanied by load drop and higher intensity AE. (2) Compared with AE, EMR has a higher correlation with load drop. There are high positive correlations among the cumulative values, relating to the cumulative released energy of coal fracture under loading, of AE energy, EMR energy and load drop. (3) The superiority frequency band of EMR is narrower than that of AE, with the former mainly concentrated in 1-25 kHz and the latter mainly in 1-280 kHz. Influenced by the initiation and propagation of the same crack, AE and EMR have similar low frequency components in the spectrum and main-frequency distribution.
-
圖 5 試樣zg1載荷降和聲電能量對比. (a)載荷降及其累計值;(b)電磁輻射能量及其累計值;(c)聲發射能量及其累計值
Figure 5. Comparisons among load drop, and energy of acoustic emission and electromagnetic radiation for sample zg1: (a) load drop and its cumulative value; (b) electromagnetic radiation energy and its cumulative value; (c) acoustic emission energy and its cumulative value
圖 6 試樣hp1載荷降和聲電能量對比. (a)載荷降及其累計值;(b)電磁輻射能量及其累計值;(c)聲發射能量及其累計值
Figure 6. Comparisons among load drop, and energy of acoustic emission and electromagnetic radiation for sample hp1: (a) load drop and its cumulative value; (b) electromagnetic radiation energy and its cumulative value; (c) acoustic emission energy and its cumulative value
表 1 煤樣載荷降和聲電能量相關性統計
Table 1. Correlation coefficients among load drop, and energy of acoustic emission and electromagnetic radiation of coal samples
試樣編號 相關性系數 載荷降與電磁輻射能量 累計載荷降與累計電磁輻射能量 載荷降與聲發射能量 累計載荷降與累計聲發射能量 電磁輻射能量與聲發射能量 累計電磁輻射能量與累計聲發射能量 zg1 0.788 0.977 0.720 0.988 0.860 0.954 zg2 0.763 0.991 0.689 0.947 0.632 0.966 zg3 0.876 0.998 0.765 0.955 0.782 0.952 zg4 0.808 0.970 0.628 0.966 0.360 0.896 zg5 0.835 0.966 0.577 0.975 0.516 0.965 平均值 0.814 0.980 0.676 0.966 0.630 0.946 hp1 0.980 0.985 0.583 0.894 0.478 0.902 hp2 0.857 0.988 0.492 0.909 0.481 0.919 hp3 0.699 0.973 0.520 0.905 0.436 0.875 hp4 0.909 0.978 0.718 0.919 0.800 0.971 hp5 0.745 0.989 0.403 0.978 0.583 0.970 平均值 0.838 0.983 0.543 0.921 0.556 0.928 總平均值 0.826 0.981 0.610 0.944 0.593 0.937 www.77susu.com -
參考文獻
[1] Yamada I, Masuda K, Mizutani H. Electromagnetic and acoustic emission associated with rock fracture. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 1989, 57(1-2): 157 doi: 10.1016/0031-9201(89)90225-2 [2] Li Z H, Lou Q, Wang E Y, et al. Experimental study of acoustic-electric and thermal infrared characteristics of roof rock failure. J China Univ Min Technol, 2016, 45(6): 1098 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201606003.htm李忠輝, 婁全, 王恩元, 等. 頂板巖石受壓破壞過程中聲電熱效應研究. 中國礦業大學學報, 2016, 45(6): 1098 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201606003.htm [3] Mastrogiannis D, Antsygina T N, Chishko K A, et al. Relationship between electromagnetic and acoustic emissions in deformed piezoelectric media: microcracking signals. Int J Solids Struct, 2015, 56-57: 118 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.027 [4] Song D Z, Wang E Y, Song X Y, et al. Changes in frequency of electromagnetic radiation from loaded coal rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2016, 49(1): 291 doi: 10.1007/s00603-015-0738-6 [5] Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Pugno N. Structural damage diagnosis and life-time assessment by acoustic emission monitoring. Eng Fract Mech, 2007, 74(1-2): 273 doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.036 [6] Wang E Y, He X Q, Li Z H, et al. Electromagnetic Radiation Technology of Coal and Rock and Its Application. 1st Ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2009王恩元, 何學秋, 李忠輝, 等. 煤巖電磁輻射技術及其應用. 1版. 北京: 科學出版社, 2009 [7] Donner R V, Potirakis S M, Balasis G, et al. Temporal correlation patterns in pre-seismic electromagnetic emissions reveal distinct complexity profiles prior to major earthquakes. Phys Chem Earth Part A/B/C, 2015, 85-86: 44 doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2015.03.008 [8] He X Q, Dou L M, Mu Z L, et al. Continuous monitoring and warning theory and technology of rock burst dynamic disaster of coal. J China Coal Soc, 2014, 39(8): 1485 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201408016.htm何學秋, 竇林名, 牟宗龍, 等. 煤巖沖擊動力災害連續監測預警理論與技術. 煤炭學報, 2014, 39(8): 1485 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201408016.htm [9] Liu J H, Zhao L, Song S M, et al. Ultrasonic velocity and acoustic emission properties of concrete eroded by sulfate and its damage mechanism. Chin J Eng, 2016, 38(8): 1075 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJKD201608005.htm劉娟紅, 趙力, 宋少民, 等. 混凝土硫酸鹽腐蝕損傷的聲波與聲發射變化特征及機理. 工程科學學報, 2016, 38(8): 1075 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJKD201608005.htm [10] Zhang J, Chai M Y, Xiang J H, et al. Fatigue damage evaluation of 316LN stainless steel using acoustic emission monitoring. Chin J Eng, 2017, 40(4): 461 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJKD201804009.htm張進, 柴孟瑜, 項靖海, 等. 基于聲發射監測的316LN不銹鋼的疲勞損傷評價. 工程科學學報, 2017, 40(4): 461 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJKD201804009.htm [11] Niccolini G, Xu J, Manuello A, et al. Onset time determination of acoustic and electromagnetic emission during rock fracture. Prog Electromagn Res Lett, 2012, 35: 51 doi: 10.2528/PIERL12070203 [12] Wang E Y, He X Q, Liu X F, et al. A non-contact mine pressure evaluation method by electromagnetic radiation. J Appl Geophys, 2011, 75(2): 338 doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.028 [13] Wang E Y, He X Q, Liu X F, et al. Comprehensive monitoring technique based on electromagnetic radiation and its applications to mine pressure. Safety Sci, 2012, 50(4): 885 doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.013 [14] Frid V, Vozoff K. Electromagnetic radiation induced by mining rock failure. Int J Coal Geol, 2005, 64(1-2): 57 doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2005.03.005 [15] Rabinovitch A, Frid V, Bahat D. Surface oscillations-a possible source of fracture induced electromagnetic radiation. Tectonophysics, 2007, 431(1-4): 15 doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.027 [16] Rabinovitch A, Frid V, Bahat D. Directionality of electromagnetic radiation from fractures. Int J Fract, 2017, 204(2): 239 doi: 10.1007/s10704-016-0178-7 [17] Li X B, Wan G X, Zhou Z L. The relation between the frequency of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) induced by rock fracture and attribute parameters of rock masses. Chin J Geophys, 2009, 52(1): 253 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200901032.htm李夕兵, 萬國香, 周子龍. 巖石破裂電磁輻射頻率與巖石屬性參數的關系. 地球物理學報, 2009, 52(1): 253 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200901032.htm [18] Zhao Y X, Jiang Y D. Acoustic emission and thermal infrared precursors associated with bump-prone coal failure. Int J Coal Geol, 2010, 83(1): 11 doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2010.04.001 [19] Zhao Y F, Pan Y S, Liu Y C, et al. Experimental study of charge induction of coal samples under uniaxial compression. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2011, 30(2): 306 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201102013.htm趙揚鋒, 潘一山, 劉玉春, 等. 單軸壓縮條件下煤樣電荷感應試驗研究. 巖石力學與工程學報, 2011, 30(2): 306 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201102013.htm [20] Potirakis S M, Karadimitrakis A, Eftaxias K. Natural time analysis of critical phenomena: the case of pre-fracture electromagnetic emissions. Chaos, 2013, 23(2): 023117-1 doi: 10.1063/1.4807908 [21] Potirakis S M, Mastrogiannis D. Critical features revealed in acoustic and electromagnetic emissions during fracture experiments on LiF. Physica A, 2017, 485: 11 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.05.025 [22] Gade S O, Weiss U, Peter M A, et al. Relation of electromagnetic emission and crack dynamics in epoxy resin materials. J Nondestruct Eval, 2014, 33(4): 711 doi: 10.1007/s10921-014-0265-5 [23] Gade S O, Alaca B B, Sause M G R. Determination of crack surface orientation in carbon fibre reinforced polymers by measuring electromagnetic emission. J Nondestruct Eval, 2017, 36: 21 doi: 10.1007/s10921-017-0403-y [24] Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Borla O, et al. Electromagnetic and neutron emissions from brittle rocks failure: experimental evidence and geological implications. Sādhanā, 2012, 37(1): 59 [25] Zhu T, Zhou J G, Wang H Q. Electromagnetic emissions during dilating fracture of a rock. J Asian Earth Sci, 2013, 73: 252 doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.05.004 [26] Ohnaka M, Mogi K. Frequency characteristics of acoustic emission in rocks under uniaxial compression and its relation to the fracturing process to failure. J Geophys Res, 1982, 87(B5): 3873 doi: 10.1029/JB087iB05p03873 -